News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS. Parent comment

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by wolf550e on Thursday November 03, 2016 @03:00PM (#12866910)
To me, C++ with operator overloading looks scary. I think a reviewer would choose to review the generated binary instead of the source code.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by revelation on Thursday November 03, 2016 @07:16PM (#12868966)
Well if operator overloading looks scary you haven't seen the assembly generated for C++ programs ;)

It's just full with con-/de-structor noise and don't even get me started with virtual function calls.

[ Parent | on HN ]