Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS
by revelation on Thursday November 03, 2016 @07:09PM
(#12868912)
RSA means big integer which means unhappy performance on devices that often don't even have floating point in hardware. I think elliptic curve could be faster?
Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS
by erichocean on Thursday November 03, 2016 @07:25PM
(#12869030)
> I think elliptic curve could be faster?
Yes, EdDSA is faster, with 64 byte signatures. Recommended.
Verifying a signature is not the simplest thing to do on hardware that doesn't even support a normal OS.
I see, that makes sense. Let's say you implement verification as:
1. Hashing the incoming data
2. Decrypting an attached signature
3. Verifying the decrypted and calculated hash are the same
Even though Step 2 would involve RSA or ECC, wouldn't Step 1 be the most expensive part regardless?
(that can take many forms, but that general idea is how most software updates currently work)