News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by conradev on Thursday November 03, 2016 @07:20PM (#12868999)
I see, that makes sense. Let's say you implement verification as:

1. Hashing the incoming data

2. Decrypting an attached signature

3. Verifying the decrypted and calculated hash are the same

Even though Step 2 would involve RSA or ECC, wouldn't Step 1 be the most expensive part regardless?

There are no comments on this comment yet.