News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS. Parent comment

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by euyyn on Thursday November 03, 2016 @01:33PM (#12866071)
Why not run Gitlab on that server?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by dchest on Thursday November 03, 2016 @01:57PM (#12866308)
It's hard to get by without all the fancy CVE features in GitLab, but software written in Ruby on Rails is banned in Canada, so they had to use good ol' reliable gitweb.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by mSparks on Thursday November 03, 2016 @03:50PM (#12867332)
->Rails is banned in Canada...

wohaa. what?

wow. an opportunity for me to use google. if you are actually serious?

edit:lol my phone default searches to bing... didn't find anything about ruby on rails being banned in canada.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by new_hackers on Thursday November 03, 2016 @04:56PM (#12867873)
haha, I did the same thing. Must be trolling, or sarcasm
[ Parent | on HN ]