BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by skykooler on Thursday November 03, 2016 @11:24AM (#12864717)

And it seems the firewall here has made a clbuttic mistake, as that page is blocked due to the url containing "porn".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by StavrosK on Thursday November 03, 2016 @01:28PM (#12866022)

So you're pretty much out of luck if you want to visit a page that contains some analysis?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by andrewstuart2 on Thursday November 03, 2016 @02:47PM (#12866777)

Well, presumably, if the author's last name is Pornin and your spam filter is pretty basic (or overzealous).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by sjs382 on Thursday November 03, 2016 @03:11PM (#12867011)

"contains some analysis"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by isostatic on Thursday November 03, 2016 @03:07PM (#12866973)

I wonder how it would cope with Scunthorpe

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by jamhan on Thursday November 03, 2016 @06:38PM (#12868699)

Or your name is "Olivia Gray". (True story, corporate mail filter blocked all that person's email)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by nailer on Friday November 04, 2016 @07:41AM (#12871796)

Why? 50 Shades? Something else?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by ConroyBumpus on Friday November 04, 2016 @08:55AM (#12872155)

Remove the space from her name and then look for a word in the middle that is commonly associated with spam emails.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by mcbain on Thursday November 03, 2016 @06:06PM (#12868431)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by captn3m0 on Thursday November 03, 2016 @02:48PM (#12866778)

[ Parent | on HN ]