News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Who's to Blame for the 16 GB RAM Limit on the New MacBook... by legohead on Monday October 31, 2016 @11:05PM (#12843057)
After hearing people complain about the new Macbook limit on 16gb RAM, I went to check out what the Surface Book offers -- which is, also, a max of 16gb RAM.
Re:Who's to Blame for the 16 GB RAM Limit on the New MacBook... by coldtea on Monday October 31, 2016 @11:34PM (#12843155)
And which nobody even thought of raising as an issue...
Re:Who's to Blame for the 16 GB RAM Limit on the New MacBook... by dlss on Monday October 31, 2016 @11:53PM (#12843265)
Because in the windows market, surface isn't a laptop targeting video editors, game programmers, etc. It's a thin and light entry. Contrast with lenovo portable workstations which got 64gb over a year ago: http://www.theverge.com/2015/8/11/9129681/lenovo-skylake-xeo...

Apple produces every osx compatible device. This means it needs to produce at least one device that can meet the needs of power users.

Re:Who's to Blame for the 16 GB RAM Limit on the New MacBook... by codepope2014 on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @03:51AM (#12844052)
Have you not watched MIcrosofts "can't do that in a Mac" campaign? 3D modelling, video editing, lots of heavy lift graphics apps...
Re:Who's to Blame for the 16 GB RAM Limit on the New MacBook... by coldtea on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @10:33PM (#12851863)
And yet most video editors I know use Macs, same for "heavy lift graphics apps". Nobody (ie very few) run around with a 8lbs/4hour battery "desktop replacement" PC to do such things on the go.
Re:Who's to Blame for the 16 GB RAM Limit on the New MacBook... by dorfsmay on Monday October 31, 2016 @11:58PM (#12843295)
I don't know about the surface, but I've bee putting off my 6 year old Thinkpad x220 because the current replacement, the x260 has a 16gb limit.
Re:Who's to Blame for the 16 GB RAM Limit on the New MacBook... by pritambaral on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @12:08AM (#12843355)
The X series of ThinkPads are designed to be slim and light. If you want 32GB in a ThinkPad, there are other series available with 32GB units.

Unfortunately, if you want a 32GB macOS laptop, you're out of luck with Apple.

Re:Who's to Blame for the 16 GB RAM Limit on the New MacBook... by fulafel on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @07:35AM (#12844804)
The X200 line (and predecessors X30 and X60 lines) are the 12" workhorse line that's more rugged than thin-and-light. The X1 line is the thin-and-light one.
Re:Who's to Blame for the 16 GB RAM Limit on the New MacBook... by dorfsmay on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @08:36AM (#12845109)
x220 is neither thin nor light! Especially with the extra battery. This is why I buy the x200 Thinkpad because they are small and can be used anywhere, yet thick an heavy because they are, or at least used to be, loaded.
Re:Who's to Blame for the 16 GB RAM Limit on the New MacBook... by mst on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @12:04PM (#12847052)
Right. I went X30 -> X40 -> X61s -> Tablet 2 -> Helix 2, the Tablet 2 as an experiment (I love the keyboard that came with it and keep that paired with my Nexus 7 now for emergency ssh-ing) and then I jumped to the Helix 2 rather than another X series because there didn't seem any point.

Somewhere around 2019-2020 when I finish destroying the Helix 2 I'll probably end up back on an X series.

Re:Who's to Blame for the 16 GB RAM Limit on the New MacBook... by nodamage on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @02:21AM (#12843807)
Not to mention the Dell XPS 13 which also uses LPDDR3 and maxes out at 16 GB.