Re:NASA Scientists Suggest We’ve Been Underestimating Sea Le...
by icebraining on Monday October 31, 2016 @02:24PM
(#12839547)
I'm not only talking about the latest event, there has been quite enough stuff: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tihange_Nuclear_Power_Station
And considering that the first reactor was designed to work until 2005, it's only natural that more parts will start to fail until 2025.
Furthermore, if people didn't oppose new reactors as vehemently as they do, there would be less pressure to continue lifetime of the old ones.
You're just reinforcing my point. If a government can be pressured into running a nuclear plant beyond its safety limits because it refuses to take the popularity hit of telling its citizens to choose an alternative, then that government can't be trusted to run any nuclear plant at all.
Re:NASA Scientists Suggest We’ve Been Underestimating Sea Le...
by dirtyaura on Monday October 31, 2016 @04:43PM
(#12840760)
You're just reinforcing my point. If a government can be pressured into running a nuclear plant beyond its safety limits because it refuses to take the popularity hit of telling its citizens to choose an alternative, then that government can't be trusted to run any nuclear plant at all.
That's a good point, yes, you are right - the correct action is to shutdown the plant as planned - and gain trust to build new ones by executing that plan.
Furthermore, if people didn't oppose new reactors as vehemently as they do, there would be less pressure to continue lifetime of the old ones