Re:NASA Scientists Suggest We’ve Been Underestimating Sea Le...
by capisce on Monday October 31, 2016 @04:36AM
(#12835042)
> The world now knows better about these harmful environmental practices, and has access to better tech to avoid this
Except the better tech tends to be more expensive and less labor intensive. A country with a huge cheap labor force would handicap itself by not using the most cost effective means to grow their economy, negative externalities notwithstanding.
Re:NASA Scientists Suggest We’ve Been Underestimating Sea Le...
by saiya-jin on Monday October 31, 2016 @11:44AM
(#12837803)
which doesn't make it right in any way - caring only about "me", "now", and not "us" and "tomorrow"
Or in other words - it explains it, but doesn't justify it. We as mankind can do better
Re:NASA Scientists Suggest We’ve Been Underestimating Sea Le...
by M_Grey on Monday October 31, 2016 @02:32PM
(#12839622)
The problem is that people don't really exist as a "We, mankind"... we exist as various competing nations and other divided groups. It's laughable to think that what's good for "We, mankind" in the US is somehow good for "We, mankind" in North Africa, or China, or India.
I feel the better arguement is that per capital these countries are lower polluters and we need to all strive to reduce pollution to an acceptable per-capita level. And as a global population need to look at how we lift everyone lifestyle while reducing environmental harm. This 'you had your turn polluting the world and now it's mine' lacks logic and will not solve the problem.