Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo...
by webrender on Sunday October 30, 2016 @01:45AM
(#12828342)
This is already in place - by default macOS does not allow apps to be installed which do not include a signed Apple developer ID. The setting can be turned off in System Preferences.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo...
by amake on Sunday October 30, 2016 @03:34AM
(#12828613)
As of Sierra this can not be disabled in System Preferences, though there are workarounds.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo...
by andai on Sunday October 30, 2016 @09:15AM
(#12829604)
I can't believe what I just read.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo...
by iNerdier on Sunday October 30, 2016 @03:57PM
(#12831889)
What are the workarounds? I upgraded, noticed the option 'anywhere' was gone and wished I hadn't...
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo...
by amake on Monday October 31, 2016 @12:31AM
(#12834321)
I meant workarounds as in there are still ways to launch non-signed apps, like right-clicking (or ctrl-clicking, or using the Finder widget menu) the app and selecting Open.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo...
by ricpass on Sunday October 30, 2016 @05:23PM
(#12832412)
Just execute "sudo spctl --master-disable" on Terminal. And the option "Anywhere" is be available again.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo...
by zanethomas on Saturday October 29, 2016 @10:01PM
(#12827696)
Do you think they still care about developers or other creative types? Judging by what the did to Final Cut and then to the Mac Pro line I'm not so sure.
There are several good alternatives to the Mac Books now and I'll be moving to Linux for my development efforts the next time I buy a machine.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo...
by apendleton on Saturday October 29, 2016 @10:11PM
(#12827725)
I wouldn't lump "developers" together with "other creative types." They depend on developers to make the apps that make their devices desirable. If devs stopped buying macs there would be nobody to make apps for iOS. They don't depend on film editors in anywhere near the same way.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo...
by jfoster on Sunday October 30, 2016 @12:49AM
(#12828222)
Exactly. I suppose if they did lose the developer segment they could open up iOS development on other platforms to remain relevant, but that whole path just seems very undesirable and a great thing to avoid.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo...
by stephen_g on Sunday October 30, 2016 @01:38AM
(#12828329)
Just a note - though FCPX had a bumpy start, there are now a lot of professional editors back using it. After the 10.1 update it most editors biggest complaints were fixed - and that was years ago.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo...
by zanethomas on Sunday October 30, 2016 @07:36PM
(#12833197)
Not to be argumentative, however :), I'm primarily a programmer but have been involved in producing two feature films in Hollywood, and do not know of a single professional editor who uses FCPX. Admittedly, the majority seem to be using Avid and may not have been using Final Cut Pro previously.
I would like to add that I don't see the Apple garbage can as a suitable hardware offering for serious editors.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo...
by therein on Sunday October 30, 2016 @12:08AM
(#12828108)
What are some decent alternatives for the MBP? I was hoping to replace my mid-2014 MBP Retina with the ones that just came out but honestly they seem really undesirable, especially with the lack of physical ESC key. Surface Book 2 seems interesting but I don't want Windows 10 to spy on me. How is Linux on the Surface Book series?
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo...
by AsyncAwait on Sunday October 30, 2016 @06:42AM
(#12829077)
You may want to give the Razer Blade series a try.
The XPS 15 is also expected to get an update soon.
There's likely a way to make both of these things happen, to some degree. For instance, they could start with just locking Macs to the app store as a default that is changeable. (similar to how Android is locked down)