News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:4.2.2.2: The story behind a DNS legend by ramchip on Wednesday April 21, 2010 @11:09AM (#1282356)
John Hawkinson had set aside 4.2/16 ("under the label "Numerology" since he had the wisdom to see that the numbers in themselves could be valuable").

My opinion is that among the reasons it is so well known are that it was designed from the very beginning to be memorable, and they folks setting up this service had the foresight to realize that having it on an easy IP was valuable.

I don't agree with the author's idea that an easy IP address is especially valuable. They're not making any money when technicians use their service because the IP is memorable...

Re:4.2.2.2: The story behind a DNS legend by aw3c2 on Wednesday April 21, 2010 @11:39AM (#1282443)
I am very very sure Google does use the data coming to their DNS for statistical analysis etc. If it is your intend to see what people visit, DNS is a highly valuable resource and an easy IP might make people use yours.
Re:4.2.2.2: The story behind a DNS legend by jeff18 on Wednesday April 21, 2010 @02:45PM (#1282995)
http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/faq.html#privacy

If you are correct, there is a massive conspiracy at Google, where a single whistleblower would be able to cost the company billions of dollars.

Re:4.2.2.2: The story behind a DNS legend by aw3c2 on Wednesday April 21, 2010 @03:46PM (#1283110)
Not sure what you mean. I mean plainly logging the domain lookups, using the data what the masses do not tainting the privacy of the individual.
Re:4.2.2.2: The story behind a DNS legend by ab9 on Wednesday April 21, 2010 @11:23AM (#1282383)
Yes, it's hard to imagine that Level 3 has made much money from that IP address. But that doesn't mean memorable IP addresses aren't, in general, valuable.

4.2.2.2 could still be considered "valuable" because it's used as a public service for the Internet community, and its memorability increases the value of that service. And Google apparently thinks it can make money from the data it collects on its 8.8.8.8 nameserver; do you think that project would be just as valuable to Google if it were 216.44.159.113 instead?

Re:4.2.2.2: The story behind a DNS legend by KC8ZKF on Wednesday April 21, 2010 @11:24AM (#1282387)
That is a pretty narrow definition of "valuable."