News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Physical Description of Flight, Revisited (2009) [pdf] by delinka on Thursday October 27, 2016 @05:15PM (#12810242)
"[T]he shape of the wing affects the efficiency and stall characteristics of the wing but not the lift. That is left to the angle of attack and speed."

So no, the top of the wing is not pulling the wing upwards. The air beneath is "blowing" the wing upwards.

Re:A Physical Description of Flight, Revisited (2009) [pdf] by nether on Thursday October 27, 2016 @05:30PM (#12810400)
It's really both. Figure 8 in the paper depicts this circulation theory of lift. The top and bottom surfaces interact via this phenomenon, though the top is more critical as the paper explains.

Also terms like "push" and "pull" really confuse the mechanics here. What matters is that a net upward force is being generated, with positive pressure acting on all sides of the airfoil. There is more pressure acting upon the lower surfaces than on the upper surfaces, but at every point the pressure is positive because it is surrounded by fluid (not in a vacuum). If you integrated the pressure acting on a lifting airfoil and computed the average direction, it would be pointed up.

Re:A Physical Description of Flight, Revisited (2009) [pdf] by mthiesen on Thursday October 27, 2016 @06:08PM (#12810733)
Good point, if the top of the wing diverts air downward via reduced air pressure above the wing, then it would be the higher pressure air underneath (pushing) that creates the lift. Yeah, I can see how terms like "push" and "pull" get pretty confusing.