News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Quantum Leap for the Web by k26dr on Thursday October 27, 2016 @05:14PM (#12810231)
Doesn't Chrome/Chromium already run as multiple processes?
Re:A Quantum Leap for the Web by Roboprog on Thursday October 27, 2016 @05:18PM (#12810278)
I believe it is "only" one process per tab on Chrome. This sounds like having multiple processes per tab (or at least, active tab), splitting up different kinds of work to "specialist" processes.

Clarification / refinement, anybody?

Re:A Quantum Leap for the Web by Manishearth on Thursday October 27, 2016 @05:46PM (#12810548)
Chrome is one process per tab (well, per origin, because same-origin JS), and within a tab is mostly single threaded (at least, this is my understanding).

Servo has a one process per tab mode (off by default), but regardless of that within a single tab both styling and layout can be parallelized across many threads, and rendering makes full use of the GPU.

This means that the active tab will be much faster. You don't care about rendering/layout speed for inactive tabs, and usually not styling speed either (restyles usually get triggered by interaction, though if you have a CSS game or something in a background tab that might matter). So process-per-tab doesn't make use of the resources it could, unless you're parallelizing within the tab. I suspect most background tab processes will be asleep or doing much less work; so while it helps for isolation (security, and less jank caused by one badly performing tab), it doesn't help as much for response time in a single tab.

Re:A Quantum Leap for the Web by Eridrus on Sunday October 30, 2016 @04:17PM (#12831993)
Chrome is working on isolating at origin boundaries, not really paying attention to it myself though.
Re:A Quantum Leap for the Web by the8472 on Thursday October 27, 2016 @05:38PM (#12810483)
There is this concept called "threads" which can be found in most operating systems.
Re:A Quantum Leap for the Web by Roboprog on Saturday October 29, 2016 @12:49AM (#12822690)
Process, thread, task, whatever.

(I so remember the first time I was reading about threads in OS/2 and Novell back in 1989 or 90 - no risk not worth taking to squeeze a little bit more out of 10 MHz CPUs with OS's with crummy process management, I guess)