You can actually have both, Tesla Model S P100D http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=38172
You understood my point...
You understand that your point is flawed? Compromise isn't always necessary! The OP was looking for innovation in this space, similar to say what Tesla did for autos.
-.- but it is. You can't make thinner devices with more battery. The way battery tech is right now is that to make it thinner you need to sacrifice battery volume and consequently capacity. Nothing short of a major technological breakthrough will change this, and nobody on earth has shown even the slightest signs of having managed to produce a better battery technology, let alone it being ready for consumer tech. So no, my point is not in the least bit flawed.
20% smaller battery on a device that consumes 50% less power = thinner device and longer battery life.
...
Which is 1.6x increase ion battery life, that would be a 2x increase if you just kept the thickness as it was. That's. the. point.
Jesus, when people want to be dense...
Re:MacBook Pro
by gm-conspiracy on Thursday October 27, 2016 @04:49PM
(#12809936)
It's funny cuz' it's true.
And I want a 700hp car that does 80mpg.
Pick one.