Re:Wikipedia is fixing one of the Internet’s biggest flaws
by zimpenfish on Wednesday October 26, 2016 @07:50AM
(#12795684)
Multiple (7 or 8) hostile inquiries cleared her of any culpability for Benghazi. Why do people persist in spreading this nonsense?
Treachery - AFAIK, other people have been charged with treason for toying with Top Secret information like she has (sending it to/from insecure email addresses).
Not caring about rights - she voted to build the Mexican wall (something Trump is often criticised for even suggesting), and said that US should "drone" Assange. (Technically, assuming the original commenter is a US citizen, that's not technically "our" rights, but given her statement about Assange, I'd imagine she'd also support "droning" of US citizens, as US has done in the past few years.)
Not caring about the constitution - I don't really disagree with her here (I don't agree with her either - basically, it's complicated), but I guess you could frame her support for greater gun control as "not respecting the constitution".