News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Computing glitch may have doomed Mars lander by Cyph0n on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @08:49AM (#12787436)
The hardware has to be manufactured from the ground up for space. The silicon has to operate over a wider temperature range, the processor needs internal redundancy as well as external redundancy, and memory (caches included) has to include support for multi-bit error correction. Getting electronics to work reliably in space is no small feat.

And since the fabs that manufacture this kind of stuff are working at a relatively large technology node, it's non-trivial to design something like an i5 for space. Why? Well, Intel and friends have no interest setting up an entire fab process that will be utilized once in a blue moon. Even if you could use a more advanced node, the extremely high circuit area overhead required to realize the requirements I listed above will remain a limiting factor.

Re:Computing glitch may have doomed Mars lander by 3chelon on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @09:20AM (#12787683)
Plus the very real and difficult problem of any system being literally shaken apart under the launch forces. AFAIK, they like to pot all circuitry in epoxy to stop the solder joints breaking.
Re:Computing glitch may have doomed Mars lander by Cyph0n on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @09:27AM (#12787733)
I did an internship at an oil drilling company, and the electronics on the tools were covered entirely with epoxy (or something similar) to minimize the impact of mechanical shocks. So yeah, I'd assume you're right.