News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week by trymas on Monday October 24, 2016 @11:17PM (#12785012)
It is not, but it could if twitter would stop spending huge piles of money that makes them go nowhere.
Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week by nikcub on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @01:06AM (#12785438)
That is exactly what many on Wall St have been telling them to do for years. Despite the popular perception of investment bankers, they do value "patio11 style businesses" more highly than the Twitter style of spending and losing billions of dollars and not going anywhere.

I actually don't think anybody values the later.

Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week by kgwgk on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @02:58AM (#12785840)
"Investment bankers" do absolutely love companies that raise money (and the faster they burn it the better, so they come back to raise more).
Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week by drakonandor on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @11:27AM (#12788757)
Their revenue almost doubled from 2014 to 2015, and is on track to be a bit higher than 2015. It's silly to pretend they're just burning money for fun.
Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week by Ryan_Shmotkin on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @06:14AM (#12786632)
The answer is in your example. Patio's business was barely profitable for a few years until closing down.

Growth or death is true for most businesses, just need to decide on the growth acceleration

Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week by napoleond on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @09:40AM (#12787837)
> barely profitable

Patrick wrote "year in review" posts going back to 2006, and they include full numbers, so you can see for yourself. Profit margins in 2014 (the most recent review) were at a whopping 60% across all his businesses. (See here: http://www.kalzumeus.com/2014/12/22/kalzumeus-software-year-...)

> closing down

He sold his SaaS businesses, and they are operated by other people. Here's a podcast episode about it: http://www.kalzumeus.com/2016/08/26/kalzumeus-podcast-episod...

They are still in operation, and presumably still profitable:

https://www.appointmentreminder.org/

https://www.bingocardcreator.com/

> Growth or death

Not really. Moving past patio11 as an example, just look at local businesses in your community. The ones that have been there the longest (> 50 years) have undoubtedly gone through periods of both growth and decline (I don't mean decline toward death, I mean decline for a bit and then start growing again). Many of the ones that have been there for about 20 years will have reached a sort of "asymptote" of growth--they would have grown for the first 10 or 15 years and then stabilized around a size that feels "comfortable". There are many more businesses in the world than just start-ups and public companies.

Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week by forgetsusername on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @11:41AM (#12788858)
>whopping 60% across all his businesses

Software built by 1 person will always have good margins. According to his numbers, BCC was making $60k in good years. 60% of that is $36k, which is a fraction of what a solid Dev can make (and an even smaller fraction of what he patio11 was making consulting). Clever side project income for sure, but not a staggering work of business genius.

Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week by napoleond on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @02:35PM (#12790382)
Sure, and I suppose "barely profitable" could be interpreted as "producing a small amount of absolute profit", but I read it as "barely producing more revenue than expenses", which is obviously incorrect in this case.
Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week by em500 on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @02:15AM (#12785708)
For software companies, "stop spending huge piles of money" means cutting jobs, see headline of this article.
Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week by trymas on Wednesday October 26, 2016 @01:08AM (#12794008)
but maybe they simply have too many employees in the first place?