Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week
by planteen on Monday October 24, 2016 @09:29PM
(#12784490)
If a that stock over time covers inflation and pays a dividend, absolutely.
Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week
by wefarrell on Monday October 24, 2016 @09:44PM
(#12784578)
You're leaving beta. Any stock that fluctuates with the market is expected to have a much higher return than inflation, and with good reason.
Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week
by dlubarov on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @12:30AM
(#12785307)
Presumably the parent meant a stock whose share price tracks inflation in spite of its dividend. So if you reinvest the dividend, you beat inflation and potentially beat the market, depending on the dividend yield.
Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week
by jdavis703 on Monday October 24, 2016 @09:37PM
(#12784544)
At that point wouldn't bonds make more sense? Seems like the risk vs. reward balance is skewed the wrong way if you own a piece of stock that stays flat.
Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week
by tedunangst on Monday October 24, 2016 @11:28PM
(#12785056)
If inflation shoots up, your bond will have the same payout but one can at least hope that dividends rise accordingly.
Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week
by coredog64 on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @12:01AM
(#12785195)
On the flip side, if the company goes bankrupt, bond holders are at or near the front of the line to be made whole.
Re:Twitter Plans Hundreds More Job Cuts as Soon as This Week
by bandrami on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @09:10AM
(#12787603)
Given that I generally hold for income rather than value, that's precisely what I look for. The last thing I want is a security that goes up in (real) value since that means they're not paying me the dividends they could.
(let's not forget that, thanks to inflation, 'flat' is actually losing money over time.)