News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The “432 Hz vs. 440 Hz” conspiracy theory by syntheticnature on Monday October 24, 2016 @03:46PM (#12782161)
Except that our day length is also changing -- very slowly, but changing it is. Further, given that the human clock, disconnected from day/night feedback, apparently treats 24.2 hours as a day.... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circadian_clock
Re:The “432 Hz vs. 440 Hz” conspiracy theory by nonbel on Monday October 24, 2016 @05:44PM (#12783184)
>"the human clock, disconnected from day/night feedback"

I am saying the second was originally linked to length of day, so the calibrated clock should be used. Also, at some point the differences due to latitude changes, etc will be biologically indistinguishable from stuff like the effect of clouds.

Re:The “432 Hz vs. 440 Hz” conspiracy theory by drdeca on Monday October 24, 2016 @05:59PM (#12783274)
So, we could say that a "circadian second" is about 1.008 seconds? (On average)

How precisely is that 24.2 known I wonder..

Re:The “432 Hz vs. 440 Hz” conspiracy theory by jdmichal on Monday October 24, 2016 @06:23PM (#12783455)
From the referenced Wikipedia link:

By recording the daily rhythms of hormones and body temperatures in 24 healthy young and old men and women over a one-month period, the researchers conclude that our internal clocks run on a daily cycle of 24 hours, 11 minutes.

...

Researchers previously reported a range of 13 to 65 hours, with a median of 25 hours, 12 minutes. The variation between our subjects, with a 95 percent level of confidence, was no more than plus or minus 16 minutes, a remarkably small range.

http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/1999/07/human-biologic...