News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NPM v4.0.0 by ceejayoz on Sunday October 23, 2016 @12:09PM (#12774073)
Out of curiosity, why use npm and bower in the same project?
Re:NPM v4.0.0 by joshstrange on Sunday October 23, 2016 @12:51PM (#12774265)
Not op but I'll chime in. My team uses npm for our build tools and bower for our frontend libraries (moment, chats, lodash, etc). Our re-write only uses npm but at the time (and possibly even now) there were frontend libraries that only provide bower packages and bower seemed like the right tool for the job anyways.
Re:NPM v4.0.0 by gotofritz on Sunday October 23, 2016 @06:34PM (#12775757)
It doesn't sound ideal having two tools that do pretty much the same thing, you are just adding a potential extra point of failure. Migrating from bower to npm is incredibly easy.
Re:NPM v4.0.0 by ferentchak on Monday October 24, 2016 @03:48PM (#12782193)
I remember wondering this same thing myself when Bower was the the new hotness.

"Don't I already have a tool that does exactly this?"

Re:NPM v4.0.0 by Sacho on Sunday October 23, 2016 @11:53PM (#12776696)
How would you migrate libraries that are only on bower, not npm?
Re:NPM v4.0.0 by ceejayoz on Monday October 24, 2016 @08:34AM (#12778216)
How many of those are a) left and b) still maintained?
Re:NPM v4.0.0 by gotofritz on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @05:06AM (#12786385)
If there are still any in 2016 it's a good sign they are not begin actively maintained