Re:A New Real-Estate War in Silicon Valley
by aianus on Saturday October 22, 2016 @07:48PM
(#12771138)
Housing of all sorts is plain expensive. A regular house in a decent family-friendly neighborhood in San Francisco costs millions of dollars.
Just an apartment is already over a million.
Re:A New Real-Estate War in Silicon Valley
by madeofpalk on Saturday October 22, 2016 @09:51PM
(#12771452)
So why is the conversation centred around "rent"? Aren't rental prices just a byproduct of purchasing price?
You want cheaper rent? Make purchasing cheaper. You want cheaper property? 'Fix' the supply/demand problem.
I'm not entirely convinced that there is a problem - SF, NY and Sydney (heh, little old Australia still trying to stay relevant here) are great cities which are in high demand (close to infinite!), yet is extremely limited in space/land. To me, it makes sense that the price reflects that demand.
Re:A New Real-Estate War in Silicon Valley
by Eridrus on Sunday October 23, 2016 @12:07PM
(#12774067)
The talk is about rent because poor people rent and there are policy options that effect rental prices directly, rather than as a byproduct. Eg in NYC there are many co-op buildings that forbid renting units, or the idea of rent control, or housing vouchers or public housing.
I think that policy options that effect supply are the ones I would prefer, but we can't ignore other options.
Re:A New Real-Estate War in Silicon Valley
by ArkyBeagle on Monday October 24, 2016 @05:31AM
(#12777564)
The word "rent" covers more than one concept. The version you seem to be at is called "rack rent" - the price of a place to sleep. "Land rents" are a much more esoteric conceptual ... mess. You have to look to David Ricardo and Henry George for that.
SF is mostly 2 story bungalows and there are actually laws against building in the majority of the city.
Re:A New Real-Estate War in Silicon Valley
by hkmurakami on Saturday October 22, 2016 @08:58PM
(#12771328)
Buying might be arguably slightly cheaper than renting due to tax savings, the down payment of 20% on a $1Mm-$3MM place is a prohibitive barrier.
Is rent uncharacteristicly high for the value of the property in SF, or is housing of all sorts just plain expensive in SF?