News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: How did Dyn fail to fend off DDOS? by ericcholis on Saturday October 22, 2016 @01:30PM (#12769595)
Does anybody have solid recommendations for secure IoT devices? Initial searches lead me to believe that they are non-existent.
Re:Ask HN: How did Dyn fail to fend off DDOS? by drather19 on Saturday October 22, 2016 @01:40PM (#12769649)
Where's the pain-free device with open source, easily upgradeable firmware, that puts all of our IoT devices in their own private network but lets us tunnel through to them? It needs to be easy enough that our (grand)parents could pick one up on Amazon, Best Buy, or Home Depot and plug in and go...
Re:Ask HN: How did Dyn fail to fend off DDOS? by fakir on Sunday October 23, 2016 @08:52AM (#12773352)
If these are connected by cellular, they are given a private network that does not connect to the public internet and are in-accessible from the public internet unless the app provider explicitly chooses to do so
Re:Ask HN: How did Dyn fail to fend off DDOS? by detaro on Saturday October 22, 2016 @06:20PM (#12770828)
Most better home routers can restrict devices connecting to the internet (either through the Firewall or more comfortably configured through family filters) and offer VPNs to the internal network?
Re:Ask HN: How did Dyn fail to fend off DDOS? by dom0 on Saturday October 22, 2016 @02:15PM (#12769843)
It's called PLAN (short for physical LAN). It doesn't need a managed switch, like VLAN, because you just use one switch for each network. Careful: Don't connect them.
Re:Ask HN: How did Dyn fail to fend off DDOS? by mathrawka on Saturday October 22, 2016 @01:39PM (#12769647)
Change the default admin password.

The original Mirai program tried a little over 60 passwords and it would just brute force into an IoT device.[1]

From what I read, it seems that one specific manufacturer in China is the owner of a lot of devices used in the Mirai botnet attacks.[2]

1: https://github.com/jgamblin/Mirai-Source-Code/blob/master/mi... 2: (I cannot find the link, but it was an article from yesterday)

EDIT:

Found this when googling the strange '7ujMko0admin' password in Mirai: http://www.cam-it.org/index.php?topic=9396.0 So it looks like the Chinese manufacturer that they target is Dahua.

Re:Ask HN: How did Dyn fail to fend off DDOS? by wgyn on Saturday October 22, 2016 @02:00PM (#12769758)
Brian Krebs pegged a company called XiongMai: https://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/10/hacked-cameras-dvrs-powe...
Re:Ask HN: How did Dyn fail to fend off DDOS? by nerdy on Saturday October 22, 2016 @02:45PM (#12769986)
That article also mentions the credentials are in the firmware.
Re:Ask HN: How did Dyn fail to fend off DDOS? by markonen on Saturday October 22, 2016 @01:56PM (#12769734)
Apple's HomeKit supports Bluetooth-only devices. Seems like a good design choice right about now.
Re:Ask HN: How did Dyn fail to fend off DDOS? by ryao on Saturday October 22, 2016 @04:44PM (#12770483)
Until Web Bluetooth opens those devices to exploitation from internet websites. It would be best if Bluetooth remained isolated from web browsers, but the powers that be want websites to be able to talk to them.
Re:Ask HN: How did Dyn fail to fend off DDOS? by joshmn on Saturday October 22, 2016 @01:35PM (#12769619)
Well, a good initial step is usually changing the default password.
Re:Ask HN: How did Dyn fail to fend off DDOS? by snowwolf on Saturday October 22, 2016 @02:10PM (#12769808)
A good initial step is not to have a default password. There was a time when all routers came with a default password and people were told to change it. They didn't. Now most new routers come with a randomly generated unique password printed on a sticker under the router. IoT devices should follow the same practice.