News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GOST cryptography – Russian Federation’s cryptographic algorithms. Parent comment

Re:GOST cryptography – Russian Federation’s cryptographic al... by andwur on Friday October 21, 2016 @07:25PM (#12765785)
I would imagine so, particularly in cryptography, being able to view the source is not the same as being able to (easily) verify it doesn't contain any backdoors. See ECDSA as good example; we can see the entire standard and yet we can't be sure that it hasn't been weakened/backdoored by its creators despite it looking secure on the surface. See the start of [0], the bit about the standard pushing state leaking through secret dependent operations.

[0] https://blog.cr.yp.to/20140323-ecdsa.html

Edit: my point here is that America would have to trust that there was no way that the Russians had added backdoors. Given their history and the current political climate I can't see that trust coming soon.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GOST cryptography – Russian Federation’s cryptographic al... by rocqua on Saturday October 22, 2016 @06:46AM (#12768186)
You can go a long way towards showing a standard hasn't been backdoored by showing the parameters were generated by 'nothing up your sleeve' numbers. E.g. start trying RSA keys at SHA-256 of 1. And keep incrementing until requirements are met.
[ Parent | on HN ]