News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web ... by androidfox on Friday October 21, 2016 @03:29PM (#12763804)
This is 1998 Link. Is this still at least partially valid
Re:The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web ... by rbinv on Friday October 21, 2016 @03:41PM (#12763915)
Probably somewhat. However, "link equity/power" has definitely (in part) been replaced by other ranking signals.
Re:The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web ... by harigov on Friday October 21, 2016 @07:47PM (#12765940)
Didn't they move towards "RankBrain" which I believe is a ML based search engine. Links maybe one of those signals but I believe user activity maybe lot more interesting for them.
Re:The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web ... by amelius on Friday October 21, 2016 @03:47PM (#12763981)
Yes, is Google still using this internally? If not, then what would be a more up to date reference?
Re:The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web ... by upen on Friday October 21, 2016 @03:58PM (#12764080)
I think Google stopped updating Pagerank two years back
Re:The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web ... by rbinv on Friday October 21, 2016 @04:01PM (#12764113)
You're thinking of the "public" PageRank value previously displayed in Google's browser toolbars. Those are indeed no longer updated. However, there is still some variant of "PageRank" in use internally.
Re:The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web ... by visarga on Friday October 21, 2016 @06:01PM (#12765278)
They are probably still using it, but I think they apply spam and duplicate content detection first and also limit PageRank flow to sites of similar topic. Another thing they could do is to nullify the old links for resold websites.

Besides that, time spent on page and social signals such as likes and tweets probably count for more than links. A crappy spam site would be disregarded pretty soon, because people would immediately bounce back to Google and try other sites.