Re:Revenue from self-driving Teslas only allowed through the...
by masklinn on Thursday October 20, 2016 @10:40AM
(#12752612)
Many high-end cars have embedded cellular connections, in 2015 Miller and Valasek managed to crack into Jeep's, jump the airgap and take control of the car over the OTA reporting connection: https://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-hig...
No idea if that's the case with Toyota, but it's definitely possible with some high-end cars (most definitely including Teslas which routinely report to the mothership) (incidentally it's fun seeing people drool over teslas then freak out at Firefox or MS telemetry)
Re:Revenue from self-driving Teslas only allowed through the...
by EdHominem on Thursday October 20, 2016 @04:09PM
(#12755681)
Amusingly, the air-gap was a firewall on a chip. No air whatsoever. They got around it a few ways, including most effectively, by re-flashing it to just be a passthrough.
Based on that, I'd say anyone who is injured because of this in any way has a great claim against the company for lying about the equipment they provided.
Re:Revenue from self-driving Teslas only allowed through the...
by adventurer on Thursday October 20, 2016 @09:53AM
(#12752157)
I'm receiving the communication about 2-3 months ahead of that schedule due to the excess mileage I'm driving. At about 6k miles, my tire sensor was going on and off for a few days, then I received an email specifically to come in to check the tire pressure. It may have be coincidence, but it's highly unlikely at this point.
I could very easily see if you go to the same mechanic and they input your mileage between visits and a system having a reasonable chance of getting scheduled maintenance correct based upon time or average mileage.
I've never heard of a company pulling data from a car OTA to do this type of work. (some car insurance companies are a different story though)