Re:Do the math: too much calculus? (2012)
by eli_gottlieb on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @09:56PM
(#12749329)
The problem with trying to teach statistics, to anyone really, is that once you get past the very basics, you have to stop every time the lecturer/textbook invokes measure theory and figure out how to explain the concepts without just making everyone sit through two to three semesters of real analysis.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Do the math: too much calculus? (2012)
by thearn4 on Thursday October 20, 2016 @09:17AM
(#12751892)
Agreed, there is definitely a huge gap between doing, for example, a t-test and deriving the t-test (or giving any substantial justification for its form). You need a class in analysis, a class in measure-theoretic probability, then a mathematical statistics class to bring you back to the topic. It's a tough square to circle.
Most who teach stats at the undergrad or hs level have little choice but to defer a lot of things to a later course.
Re:Do the math: too much calculus? (2012)
by hilop on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @10:13PM
(#12749384)
You just use discrete scenarios, not continuous. Same concepts, easier math.
same way you can do linear geometry without calculus.
Re:Do the math: too much calculus? (2012)
by eli_gottlieb on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @11:02PM
(#12749497)
In my experience, just knowing discrete probability and statistics is profoundly unuseful, especially when you walk out of class thinking you know the subject, sign up for a next course that involves real-valued quantities, and bomb everything.