On the wikileak-ed emails from Tanden on Lessig

Re:On the wikileak-ed emails from Tanden on Lessig by wallace_f on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @03:52AM (#12741896)

Instead of being incredibly rude and insulting, next time if you don't follow somebody's argument, try to read it again and try to make sense of it. It does make sense in this case.

I did write that out quickly though, and it is a bit disjointed and quickly-written. Still, I think you should be able to follow along and grasp the points. I think you're being disingenuous that you can't, maybe because you don't want to continue a civil discussion for whatever reason you have.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On the wikileak-ed emails from Tanden on Lessig by argonaut on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @08:57AM (#12743303)

If you don't address my point, and instead go on long non sequitur tangents, there is no discussion to be had.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On the wikileak-ed emails from Tanden on Lessig by wallace_f on Thursday October 20, 2016 @08:53AM (#12751780)

Well I did respond to what you said, and that is apparent. Thanks for continuing to insult my intelligence though, good on ya mate.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On the wikileak-ed emails from Tanden on Lessig by argonaut on Friday October 21, 2016 @09:33PM (#12766488)

Nowhere did I insult your intelligence. I insulted your argument.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On the wikileak-ed emails from Tanden on Lessig by wallace_f on Sunday October 23, 2016 @10:53PM (#12776545)

No, you didn't even take the time to criticize my argument, you dismissed it entirely. If you had actually read it you would understand what I was trying to say.

[ Parent | on HN ]