News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On the wikileak-ed emails from Tanden on Lessig by hackuser on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @12:56AM (#12741183)
> How could WikiLeaks be interpreted as anything other than promoting civil liberties? Its sole purpose ...

Perhaps taken at face value that's true, but I judge them by their actions:

* They consistently advocate for one political point of view, an anti-US government one. Where are leaks about Putin? Bernie Sanders? Jill Stein? For comparison, the NY Times is hard on both candidates: For example, they both broke the Clinton email server story and Trump's tax return.

* They are cooperating in what appears to be a Russian intelligence disinformation campaign to disrupt U.S. democracy. Assange seems too smart to be an unwitting participant.

* There are reports it's due to a vendetta Assange has against Clinton.

Based on the above and other actions, I question whether their mission really is to promote civil liberties.

Re:On the wikileak-ed emails from Tanden on Lessig by Kristine1975 on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @04:00AM (#12741939)
Wikileaks can only publish what they are given. If nobody gives them leaks on Putin, Sanders etc. they can't publish any.
Re:On the wikileak-ed emails from Tanden on Lessig by hackuser on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @08:40AM (#12743201)
A good point, but how do we know it's true? Does Wikileaks solicit material? Are they selective about what they publish?

I see what they claim to do, but it's too important to take at face value.