News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The real Soylent sickness by Spooky23 on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @06:02PM (#12739141)
I think the idea of Soylent as a replacement for food is almost like an uncanny valley type affect for most people.

Food is life. If you've replaced food with some manufactured shake, it just seems fundamentally wrong. Meals aren't obligations, they are when people get together. They're a time to reflect and experience life. WTF are you doing that eating dinner is too much of a burden?

I can see using something like Soylent as a backup for fueling up while traveling or leaving it at your desk or in the car for a pinch situation. Full on food replacement conjures up images of lonely, single people giving up on life.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by minitech on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @06:24PM (#12739275)
(Was there anything wrong with being single?)

Your “lonely people giving up on life” is a huge reach. It’s just food. People are capable of socializing outside of meals.

Setting that aside for a moment, though, you also don’t have to replace every meal, as is mentioned elsewhere in the comments. How about just breakfast? Despite it being greatly beneficial to start the day with food, many people feel like they don’t have the time. Something quick, filling, and taking no preparation is ideal.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by ghaff on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @06:55PM (#12739469)
And I honestly doubt that anyone here or most places has an issue with Soylent as start-your-day food. After all, smoothies (often with all sorts of questionable "powerfood" additives) are a big thing these days. The hackles come up when it's promoted or discussed as a broader meal replacement.
Re:The real Soylent sickness by kafkaesq on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @07:05PM (#12739534)
And I honestly doubt that anyone here or most places has an issue with Soylent as start-your-day food.

"Powerfood" additives, being basically an orthogonal component -- aside, it's basically a powdered (or perhaps pasteurized concentrate, a la Minute Made) remake of the classic, fresh-everything version of your regular breakfast smoothie.

You don't see any issues with that?

The hackles come up when it's promoted or discussed as a broader meal replacement.

Which just so happens to be Soylent's business plan.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by ghaff on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @07:49PM (#12739774)
The standard counter to Soylent criticism though is that it's just an alternative to other quick meals on the go. Personally, I do often make smoothies in the morning and have never had a Soylent so I'm not going to argue against more natural is healthier--even if I'm not going to try to substantiate that general preference scientifically.

But yes. Their broader business plan and certainly what gets the press seems to be Soylent as broader meal replacement. If this were just another "nutritional drink on the go" absolutely no one would care.