News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The real Soylent sickness by dmix on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @05:27PM (#12738884)
Your solution seems to be invest more time into learning how to grocery shop and prep food better, which supports the OPs argument that it is a real investment to make. Whereas the whole point of Soylent is the chance to skip this whole time investment and optimization process.

Some people would rather trade the highs/lows of grocery shopping and cooking for simple, healthy meals, but mostly bland meals. I don't think Soylent is the answer for everyone, it's a niche the same way Whole Foods is a niche. But they do have a real value prop that is easily overlooked if you only look at the food part of it, instead of all of the other processes around it.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by Spooky23 on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @06:02PM (#12739141)
I think the idea of Soylent as a replacement for food is almost like an uncanny valley type affect for most people.

Food is life. If you've replaced food with some manufactured shake, it just seems fundamentally wrong. Meals aren't obligations, they are when people get together. They're a time to reflect and experience life. WTF are you doing that eating dinner is too much of a burden?

I can see using something like Soylent as a backup for fueling up while traveling or leaving it at your desk or in the car for a pinch situation. Full on food replacement conjures up images of lonely, single people giving up on life.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by minitech on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @06:24PM (#12739275)
(Was there anything wrong with being single?)

Your “lonely people giving up on life” is a huge reach. It’s just food. People are capable of socializing outside of meals.

Setting that aside for a moment, though, you also don’t have to replace every meal, as is mentioned elsewhere in the comments. How about just breakfast? Despite it being greatly beneficial to start the day with food, many people feel like they don’t have the time. Something quick, filling, and taking no preparation is ideal.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by ghaff on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @06:55PM (#12739469)
And I honestly doubt that anyone here or most places has an issue with Soylent as start-your-day food. After all, smoothies (often with all sorts of questionable "powerfood" additives) are a big thing these days. The hackles come up when it's promoted or discussed as a broader meal replacement.
Re:The real Soylent sickness by kafkaesq on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @07:05PM (#12739534)
And I honestly doubt that anyone here or most places has an issue with Soylent as start-your-day food.

"Powerfood" additives, being basically an orthogonal component -- aside, it's basically a powdered (or perhaps pasteurized concentrate, a la Minute Made) remake of the classic, fresh-everything version of your regular breakfast smoothie.

You don't see any issues with that?

The hackles come up when it's promoted or discussed as a broader meal replacement.

Which just so happens to be Soylent's business plan.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by ghaff on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @07:49PM (#12739774)
The standard counter to Soylent criticism though is that it's just an alternative to other quick meals on the go. Personally, I do often make smoothies in the morning and have never had a Soylent so I'm not going to argue against more natural is healthier--even if I'm not going to try to substantiate that general preference scientifically.

But yes. Their broader business plan and certainly what gets the press seems to be Soylent as broader meal replacement. If this were just another "nutritional drink on the go" absolutely no one would care.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by kafkaesq on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @05:35PM (#12738944)
Whereas the whole point of Soylent is the chance to skip this whole time investment and optimization process.

Right -- as with the entire junk food industry in general, basically.

As in: yes, there's certainly a big "value prop" in getting you past that next perceived craving (or legitimate nutritional need), as expediently as possible. But whether that provides a good "value" in the long run (either nutritionally or financially) is highly questionable.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by allemagne on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @05:47PM (#12739025)
Conflating meal replacement products with junk food is silly. They accomplish entirely different goals.
Re:The real Soylent sickness by kafkaesq on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @05:54PM (#12739071)
That's the thing -- they're trying to convince people that their product is a "meal replacement". In the same way that caffeine and other stimulates are de-facto "sleep replacements" (and alcohol, a de-facto "self-esteem replacement") for many people. And indeed, most highly processed foods (a.k.a. "junk foods") have been successfully positioned as "replacements" for ... foods that actually come from farms, small bakeries and dairies, and so forth.

But whether any of these actually are viable "replacements" (considering long-term health and other side effects) is again very much open to question.