Re:Twitterfeed will be shutting its doors on October 31st, 2016
by brudgers on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @08:53PM
(#12740077)
Often open sourcing a project requires a lot of work. If it uses licensed technology it may require some money too. And sometimes the engineering is uniquely tuned to the context in which the project was developed to the point that it makes no sense, for example the code contains dependencies on specific service providers like hosting companies or CDN's or expects unique hardware configurations.
Re:Twitterfeed will be shutting its doors on October 31st, 2016
by ben_jones on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @09:47PM
(#12740350)
Surely there is value in code that can't be run. If I write a nodejs app that only runs on Google app engine, it still might be useful to someone else.
Re:Twitterfeed will be shutting its doors on October 31st, 2016
by zachlatta on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @02:25AM
(#12741546)
I think you underestimate the difficulty of open sourcing some projects.
At the last company I worked at, we really wanted to open source some of the stuff we were doing, but we literally couldn't because we depended on some private APIs and were under NDA.
Why does something useful have to go away because a business couldn't be made of it?