News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The real Soylent sickness by paulcole on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @04:16PM (#12738242)
> disinterest in cooking and a desire to avoid the time spent during food preparation

You say this like it's a feature not a bug.

> Grocery shopping for one is frustrating

Like other valuable skills, you can get better at it.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by x1798DE on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @04:19PM (#12738274)
> You say this like it's a feature not a bug.

I think it sounds more like they are saying that it's a preference. Preferences are generally neither features nor bugs (though they can be useful in some situations and frustrating in others).

[dead]
Re:The real Soylent sickness by 59nadir on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @04:40PM (#12738466)
Do you realize how ridiculous it sounds when you equate not wanting to cook because you'd rather do something else with a socially crippling disorder?
Re:The real Soylent sickness by M_Grey on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @05:24PM (#12738857)
Not wanting to cook, and eating slurry which may or may not actually be healthy in the long run is hardly comparable. Lots of people don't want to cook, it is presumably a much smaller subset which would prefer the slurry.
Re:The real Soylent sickness by 59nadir on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @05:33PM (#12738930)
We were discussing whether or not it's a "feature" that you don't have to cook and the rationale for that thinking is simply that some people don't want to cook. Whatever you replace the act of cooking with in that example is entirely up to you. But it's undeniably a feature to some people and were I not married I would very likely replace a few meals with something like this, if it was available to me where I live.

I find it interesting that there are so many of you that take offense to what other people choose to do with their own time and energy, as well as what they eat. Have you noticed a lot of people dislike people who try to force their lifestyles and/or dietary choices on other people? Do you see any similarities between those people and your own comments, perhaps?

Re:The real Soylent sickness by M_Grey on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @05:34PM (#12738942)
Reading in offense to what I've said? It's not there. If anything, I'd say that my original comment caused offense, which I'm now having to manage. Typical, boring, but then, I did walk into this.

i can't imagine wanting to waste time on food, i've felt this way for as long as I can remember

I'm not talking about, or to people who use Soylent instead of a granola bar.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by 59nadir on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @05:49PM (#12739035)
> Reading in offense to what I've said? It's not there.

I would hope that the reason you compared not wanting to cook with, again, a socially crippling disorder was that you were somehow offended by the idea of other people having different priorities than you.

I can understand someone having an emotional outburst because they're offended by other people not being like them, along with a lapse in judgment and ending up writing that comment, but I can't understand how someone would get there from a rational point of view. I assumed, charitably, that you were somehow offended.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by M_Grey on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @06:19PM (#12739247)
"Not wanting to cook..."

And again, how much clearer can I be in that I'm not talking about that? You're welcome to ignore that fact, and go on these intensely boring rhetorical diversions, but it achieves nothing.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by cgag on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @04:44PM (#12738504)
whats the name of the disability to preferring indoor plumbing to carrying buckets of water from the closest river?

i can't imagine wanting to waste time on food, i've felt this way for as long as I can remember

Re:The real Soylent sickness by M_Grey on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @05:23PM (#12738850)
I'm sure the same could be said for a number of disabilities. The fact that you've compared an essentially unstudied liquid diet with indoor plumbing, and all other sources of food to hauling water, makes feel somewhat vindicated in my assessment. Not happy about it though, because it implies a kind of predatory relationship between Soylent marketing, and their intended demographic.

I can't tell you how few people I hear trumpeting it as a meal replacement now and then, vs. those who seem to have an extreme difficulty either with food, or food prep.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by cgag on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @06:05PM (#12739155)
are we talking about soylent or the concept of a meal replacement?
Re:The real Soylent sickness by M_Grey on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @06:48PM (#12739407)
The concept of (near) total meal replacement with unproven sources of nutrition, such as Soylent.
Re:The real Soylent sickness by evgen on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @04:53PM (#12738596)
Not quite sure. Is it related to the disability where you prefer a colostomy because you can't imaging wasting time in the bathroom?
Re:The real Soylent sickness by cgag on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @05:22PM (#12738844)
If I could some sort of pill that meant I didn't have to go to the bathroom, I most definitely would.
Re:The real Soylent sickness by TheSpiceIsLife on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @06:53PM (#12739441)
One easy solution is to simply stop eating, natural selection will take care of the rest.
Re:The real Soylent sickness by sosborn on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @04:42PM (#12738484)
That's ridiculous. Would you categorize every preference this way? Why or why not?
Re:The real Soylent sickness by 59nadir on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @04:29PM (#12738361)
Yes, it is a feature for some people; they simply don't like cooking and don't want to spend time on it.
Re:The real Soylent sickness by evgen on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @04:53PM (#12738607)
No, people who don't like cooking let other people cook for them and go out to eat or have food delivered. Soylent is for people who do not like to eat food. Big difference.
Re:The real Soylent sickness by robinson7d on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @05:14PM (#12738771)
I don't think it has to be so black and white. There's room for a variety of small preferences to cause a person to choose one thing over another.

Going out to eat may be tastier, but it's generally more expensive. When it's not more expensive (than Soylent) it's often to some degree a mixture of the following:

1. Not vegan

2. Not tasty anyway (i.e. fast food)

3. More time consuming (the place that you like is far enough away)

I'm certain you can find other potential reasons.

Each of these may affect different people for different reasons and to different amounts (e.g. some may not care about vegan).

Ultimately, it's up to each person to decide on their own personal preferences, and the weigh their own perceived costs. For some, that may result in Soylent being a preferred option for some meals (these preferences are dynamic). For others, it's never a preferred option. That just seems like part of being human, to be honest; no sense for either side to get upset at the other.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by 59nadir on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @05:02PM (#12738689)
No, I don't think you can generalize like that. I like eating just fine, but I would consider Soylent if I wasn't married mostly because I just don't like cooking. Going out or ordering isn't financially all that feasible, whereas Soylent actually could be.
Re:The real Soylent sickness by allemagne on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @04:35PM (#12738412)
Is grocery shopping a valuable skill? Is it bad to avoid cooking? Do these questions have only one right answer that works for everyone?
Re:The real Soylent sickness by Nadya on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @04:39PM (#12738451)
>You say this like it's a feature not a bug.

As far as I'm concerned it is a feature. So many hours are completely wasted in meal prep that I could spend doing literally anything else. Like reading a book or not cooking.

>Like other valuable skills, you can get better at it.

I don't see how I can feasibly remove every other grocery shopper from the store when I go shopping. Or people who stop in the middle of the isle preventing traffic flow in both directions, kids acting up [0], the choice between annoying small-talk with the cashier or the annoyance of the faulty self-checkout machines [1]. People rushing around corners, nearly hitting people. The annoyance when the singular item you're searching for is out of stock that day. The store now has mounted televisions spamming ads for products on every other isle - now I get to shop with headphones on, yay!

I have control over nothing. There is nothing to get better at. Like driving (another annoying but necessary thing), it is something that so many people do without consideration or thought of others that the entire experience is ruined. I don't mind driving. I hate driving with other people on the road who cut across traffic, fail to signal, randomly brake for no reason, and otherwise drive like they are the only person on the road. Grocery shopping suffers the same fate: it sucks because everyone else seems to suck at it. And unlike driving on an empty road at two in the morning, there aren't many places I can go shopping for groceries at two in the morning.

It takes me less than ten minutes to purchase a week's worth of groceries. I've purchased the same exact things week in and week out for the past three years. I practically have my weekly trip down to a science. It seems to be that nobody else has figured out how to shop for groceries.

If you have a fix for removing other people from the equation that isn't illegal, I'd love to hear it.

[0] Kids act up, that's fine. I grew up with younger siblings. The difference is my mom would at least make an attempt to get them to stop throwing a tantrum in the middle of an aisle. It seems some parents have given up on the parenting part altogether.

[1] "Please bag your item." when the item has already been bagged. Continue until the clerk watching the self-checkouts comes over and kicks the machine out of the error loop. No way to enter "x20" of an item, I regularly purchase two dozen individually-packaged cans of chili. So I get to scan one of them 24 times and hope I don't lose track as there is no way to count how many I've already scanned.

Re:The real Soylent sickness by unethical_ban on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @04:45PM (#12738515)
Do you discriminate equally against those that eat out often in order to avoid the same activities?