Researchers reach human parity in conversational speech recognition

Re:Researchers reach human parity in conversational speech r... by ghurtado on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @03:14PM (#12737731)

What a useless definition. I could just as easily say that no being (artificial or not) can be considered intelligent so long as it believes in flying spaghetti monsters.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Researchers reach human parity in conversational speech r... by PravlageTiem on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @06:53PM (#12739442)

I didn't say "intelligent". I said "AI", as in "artificial intelligence" which implies a simulation of human intelligence. Machine processes already exist that demonstrate, say, ant-like intelligence.

[ Parent | on HN ]