Re:Ecuador Says It Still Backs Assange, but WikiLeaks Says I...
by Etzos on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @01:23PM
(#12736709)
It is a real word though.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&searc...
Re:Ecuador Says It Still Backs Assange, but WikiLeaks Says I...
by thingexplainer on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @01:28PM
(#12736766)
Thanks, learned something new.
Re:Ecuador Says It Still Backs Assange, but WikiLeaks Says I...
by zem on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @01:35PM
(#12736824)
interesting, I've always used "nonymous" for that, but "onymous" is etymologically sounder
Re:Ecuador Says It Still Backs Assange, but WikiLeaks Says I...
by jcranmer on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @01:52PM
(#12736973)
Yeah, I was going to say "nonymous" was etymologically superior, but then I looked up the etymology for anonymous before hitting send.
Given that the English (/Germanic) is "name" and the French is "nom", I would have expected the PIE for name to be some sort of "nVm"-ish thing, whence I expected the Greek to render it is some sort of "non"-ish thing. The actual Greek is ónoma, with the PIE being something like *hnómn. (So my PIE guess was right-ish, but the transition to Hellenic was wrong).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Onymous