It's not a mistake that any level of provocation by Russia is met with weeks of saber rattling and outrage in the media.
Although ISIS is a good driver for expanding the intelligence community. Hillary Clinton's primary military strategy that she promotes on her website is expanding an already bloated intelligence community and broadening intelligence collection. Both candidates are very much industrial complex friendly. That's one of the few things that's certain in this election.
But it is - the US military fought the Taliban in a landlocked country with F18s launched from aircraft carriers 200 miles away!
Sadly, they underestimated the ability for power to entrench itself despite term limits, separation of powers, federal/state split, etc.
"Shock Doctrine".
Given the influence the state has on the media, it's nearly impossible to blame the electorate. They exist in a media bubble that makes these state-sanctioned power grabs seem reasonable, even cost-free.
Look at the scare du jour, ISIS. I mean, come on! We have the worlds largest military by a factor of 10, and yet people are peeing their pants at the sight of a few gun-toting crazies 8,000 miles away!! We faced down USSR which had the capability to annihilate us 100 times over, and yet we cringe at the sight of ISIS. What's wrong with these people?