News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Shame on Y Combinator by idlewords on Monday October 17, 2016 @10:27PM (#12731562)
Political debate in the US has traditionally taken place in a framework of shared values. Some of these are: you accept electoral defeat, you nominate people with a basic minimum of human decency, and overt bigotry is not acceptable.

Within that framework, people have sharp disagreements over issues, some of them life-or-death (like abortion). But the framework is something that was sacrosanct, until this election.

The problem many people, including conservatives, have with Trump is that he breaks basic norms around how our democracy should work, and represents a threat to it. That's why Thiel's vocal support for his candidacy is so troubling. It's not just a case of someone whose politics I disagree with, it's someone financing the destruction of the whole apparatus those politics take place within.

Re:Shame on Y Combinator by trentmb on Monday October 17, 2016 @10:30PM (#12731568)
> and overt bigotry is not acceptable.

I'm scared to ask- is this really true?

Re:Shame on Y Combinator by joshmn on Monday October 17, 2016 @10:33PM (#12731576)
I'd personally like to think we've gotten better as a society over the years.
Re:Shame on Y Combinator by trentmb on Monday October 17, 2016 @10:43PM (#12731617)
Clumsy on my part- I was asking historically.
Re:Shame on Y Combinator by joshmn on Monday October 17, 2016 @11:21PM (#12731777)
Pardoned!
Re:Shame on Y Combinator by youforpresident on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @11:38AM (#12735507)
is hidden bigotry more acceptable?