News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test. Parent comment

Re:Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test by gautamdivgi on Thursday October 13, 2016 @01:24PM (#12702434)
You proved P = NP??? In a little more than 45 mins or did you misunderstand the question?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test by krapp on Thursday October 13, 2016 @01:29PM (#12702484)
If I were asked that question, my answer would be that obviously P != NP because the former doesn't have an N at the front.

The pain of being tossed out onto the pavement would totally be worth it.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test by mcphage on Thursday October 13, 2016 @11:43PM (#12706001)
What if N = 1?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test by nkassis on Thursday October 13, 2016 @04:02PM (#12703589)
might get you bonus points. It's a clever answer.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test by krapp on Friday October 14, 2016 @03:40PM (#12710544)
If you think it's actually clever, you're overthinking it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test by mcphage on Thursday October 13, 2016 @01:27PM (#12702464)
His point was that, hearing only one side of the story, the OP could claim whatever they wanted.
[ Parent | on HN ]