Trump reportedly asked three times why we could not use nuclear weapons in a private briefing.
More importantly, he threatens to change the landscape of our deployed military so drastically that the moves would create opportunities for non-allies to take more aggressive positions against our allies.
If we failed to protect our allies, the US economy would tank, due to all the outstanding treasuries.
> Did he vote for the Iraq war?
Obviously Trump could not have voted on the Iraq war. That's an invalid question.
No, he's never served as a politician and so has no platform record. He's never demonstrated an ability to serve his country so I don't understand why we should entrust him with our most powerful station.
> Has he shown an inclination towards mass murder in other scenarios?
I don't believe there's any evidence of that.
> What evidence do you have that Trump has any more likelihood of using a nuclear bomb against the wishes of congress than Hillary?
To me it's his lack of temperament. I'm confident he means what he says that he doesn't want to use nuclear weapons. But in dire situations which may arise, I personally do not trust his temperament or judgement in dealing with foreign powers. This is because he's shown many times that he only cares for the most short-term benefits. His tax plans demonstrate this, his inability to explain many of his plans demonstrates this, and his history in business demonstrates this.
I'm not sure if this was a subtle way to imply that, although the risk of Trump using the bomb is negligible, it's still greater than zero, which is the number of lives you consider lost to abortion. Impressive accidental troll. :)
Realistically, what evidence do you have that Trump has any more likelihood of using a nuclear bomb against the wishes of congress than Hillary? Has he shown an inclination towards mass murder in other scenarios? Did he vote for the Iraq war?