Re:Standing-only escalators can carry up to 30 per cent more...
by OscarCunningham on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @06:25AM
(#12691668)
Even if leaving space for people to walk is slower on average it might still be better because it allows people in a hurry to go faster.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Standing-only escalators can carry up to 30 per cent more...
by liotier on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @06:33AM
(#12691706)
Optimize for latency of one class vs. optimize for total throughput... Both are valid choices in different contexts... Welcome to network QOS management !
Re:Standing-only escalators can carry up to 30 per cent more...
by SilkRoadie on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @07:13AM
(#12691880)
From the foot of the elevator people walking will reach the top faster. However, navigating from the back of the queue at peak time to the start of the escalator is often time consuming.
It would be interesting what the times were between those navigating the queue and walking up vs during the trial where everyone stands but the queue to the escalator is shorter.
Re:Standing-only escalators can carry up to 30 per cent more...
by snowwolf on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @08:19AM
(#12692147)
This. Systems Thinking teaches us that optimising a small part of the system (walking up the escalators) can have unintended consequences (bottlenecks/queues elsewhere) that result in the time through the whole system to be slower.
Re:Standing-only escalators can carry up to 30 per cent more...
by 4ad on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @08:29AM
(#12692197)
People who stand and queue up do not block the people who want to walk. The queue leaves access for the people who are willing to walk.
Re:Standing-only escalators can carry up to 30 per cent more...
by snowwolf on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @08:50AM
(#12692315)
Apparently you haven't been on the London Underground at rush hour. The escalator halls aren't long enough for an orderly queue to form on one side when a tube offloads its passengers.
Re:Standing-only escalators can carry up to 30 per cent more...
by bboreham on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @09:15AM
(#12692477)
The original problem they are trying to solve is a big crowd of waiting people develops at the bottom of the escalator, and since London Underground passageways are quite narrow this blocks back until the platform gets overcrowded, which is unsafe.
Re:Standing-only escalators can carry up to 30 per cent more...
by swearfu on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @10:36AM
(#12693204)
Then don't you think they should encourage everyone to keep moving instead of being lazy and standing there. Escalators, like moving walkways, are designed to move people faster, not for people to just stand there like sheep.
Re:Standing-only escalators can carry up to 30 per cent more...
by bboreham on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @02:32PM
(#12695388)
It turns out you cannot simply order people to do something they find inconvenient or difficult, even if it is in their best interests.
Re:Standing-only escalators can carry up to 30 per cent more...
by galdosdi on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @02:53PM
(#12695541)
Do they have a parallel set of stairs next to them? That usually seems to limit crowding, since the bigger the queue for the escalator gets, the more likely newcomers are to just take the stairs instead of join the escalator queue.