News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Suspicious court cases, missing defendants, aim to get we... by kbenson on Monday October 10, 2016 @02:03PM (#12678745)
> Since they are apparently doing it in states where they have guaranteed the person does not exist, who is going to argue?

That's interesting. This may be a case where you are more secure if your name is common, such as John Smith, since I think the likelihood of finding a state without a John Smith in residence is fairly small.

Re:Suspicious court cases, missing defendants, aim to get we... by paulajohnson on Tuesday October 11, 2016 @07:51AM (#12683461)
OTOH demonstrating that none of the John Smiths in the state are the one named in the paperwork might be more difficult.