News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by paulcole on Sunday October 09, 2016 @01:17PM (#12672130)
>As a data source for academic study it's unparalleled.

Does that actually mean it's valuable? Just because something's one of a kind doesn't mean it's worth that much.

Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by DigitalJack on Sunday October 09, 2016 @01:21PM (#12672158)
The phrase "x is unparalleled" implies uniqueness by virtue of the value it provides.

GP is basically saying twitter has accumulated a vast wealth of social data that is immensely valuable to the research community.

Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by oldmanjay on Sunday October 09, 2016 @01:36PM (#12672247)
Sounds like the academic community should be charged for access to the data, if there is so much value in there.
Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by Tempest1981 on Sunday October 09, 2016 @01:47PM (#12672308)
The media is clearly benefiting, with many stories backed by a Donald Trump tweet. But if the tweets weren't free to begin with, they might not be as newsworthy.
Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by JumpCrisscross on Sunday October 09, 2016 @02:26PM (#12672539)
> the media is clearly benefiting

Journalists certainly are. Getting quotes was hard work. Now it consists of trawling Twitter. Not sure if this has been a boon or bane for journalism, however.

Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by Godel_unicode on Sunday October 09, 2016 @09:13PM (#12674481)
> Journalists certainly are

In the short term, anyway. The substitution of Twitter-trawling for actual journalism and research is doing immense damage in the long run.

Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by bbctol on Sunday October 09, 2016 @01:43PM (#12672282)
For full access to the twitter archive, they are, though a lot of data can be gleaned from what's publicly posted.
Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by oldmanjay on Sunday October 09, 2016 @02:09PM (#12672439)
In retrospect I should have assumed that to be the case
Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by Godel_unicode on Sunday October 09, 2016 @09:12PM (#12674476)
I think you (and many others) have this relationship by the wrong end. Things which are valuable are frequently rare/unique, whereas there are many unique/rare things with no value whatsoever. As others in this thread have implied, the lack of ability to monetize is strongly correlated with a lack of real value.
Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by Shivetya on Sunday October 09, 2016 @01:37PM (#12672253)
that is my concern as well, if it truly was so widespread and useful I doubt they could turn a profit, however its real market is apparently much smaller than people suspect.

twitter simply cannot reach people who don't go looking for it, it would need to basically just randomly show up on your instant messenger unbidden, it has no universal connector like radio and tv which are everywhere.

then the last issue is there are too many voices on twitter so only those connected get out and assume importance. importance to only users of the medium

Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by consto on Sunday October 09, 2016 @03:04PM (#12672780)
> twitter simply cannot reach people who don't go looking for it

I'm not so sure. Hashtags are everwhere both physical and digital, companies want to to start tweeting about their event/product/etc. As for a direct connection, how often have you see a tweet embedded in a news article, or displayed on live TV?

Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by gaius on Sunday October 09, 2016 @03:43PM (#12673003)
Hashtags are everywhere, but it doesn't follow that Twitter is - see FB, Insta, even LinkedIn.
Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by megablast on Sunday October 09, 2016 @09:45PM (#12674544)
It means it is easy to access. That is all.