News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by Rustydave on Sunday October 09, 2016 @01:16PM (#12672127)
How about charging users?. Like monthly plans etc.
Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by echelon on Sunday October 09, 2016 @01:20PM (#12672154)
Wasn't there some "Twitter alternative" launched by someone who used HN? Its entire business model was to bill users. I can't remember the name of it, or the founder, but I think the service failed to gain traction.

edit: The service was/is App.net, and it was founded by Dalton Caldwell. It used to make the rounds on HN all the time.

Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by Klibarchu on Sunday October 09, 2016 @03:48PM (#12673037)
It was a good idea, but the execution was ridiculous.
Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by andromeduck on Sunday October 09, 2016 @02:42PM (#12672653)
IMO the best way would be to do microtransactions and go whale hunting. For example, you could charge a quarter for every character past the current word limit and a dollar per character after 200 and kill two birds with one stone.
Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by nhebb on Sunday October 09, 2016 @03:10PM (#12672829)
Instead of charging all users, they could offer premium accounts that allowed longer posts, did not display ads, have private circle-like channels that you could post to for closed conversations, etc. They haven't expanded the feature set to take advantage of these opportunities, though, so senior management seems to lack the imagination to drive it towards profits.
Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by ghaff on Sunday October 09, 2016 @03:37PM (#12672967)
I don't know if Twitter has ever spoken about it but the lack of premium accounts has long puzzled me. Surely there are worthwhile features they could offer without degrading the free tier experience. My circles are perhaps atypical but for those of us who use it as a fairly important professional tool, a $50/year pro account would be a complete no-brainer. Maybe there aren't enough people like this to deal with the complications. It seems unlikely they haven't thought about it. But the lack is still surprising.
Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by RileyKyeden on Sunday October 09, 2016 @01:54PM (#12672347)
Most of the people I talk to on Twitter don't have money to spare. They're the kind of people who have to toss up a fundraiser to make rent because they had a surprise medical bill or car repair.
Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by blakeyrat on Sunday October 09, 2016 @07:13PM (#12674081)
They could offer "premium" accounts, the way Amazon does or Hulu used to, where there are no ads and some add-in services are discounted or free.

Or they could offer little widgets you can buy and post on your profile page, like LiveJournal does (assuming it still does; it's been ages.)

Or a combination of the two, like DeviantArt.

There's plenty of options. Hell, sell Twitter plushies. That failwhale image was pretty cute.

Re:Could Twitter Be Better Off as a Nonprofit? by ori_b on Sunday October 09, 2016 @01:39PM (#12672262)
If they do this, there will probably be no users left to charge.