EC2's most dangerous feature

Re:EC2's most dangerous feature by brettproctor on Sunday October 09, 2016 @04:58AM (#12670386)

Assuming dwaxe replies claiming to not be a robot, how would we go about verifying? :P

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EC2's most dangerous feature by pilsetnieks on Sunday October 09, 2016 @08:40AM (#12670943)

We could administer it a test of some sort, and evaluate the ensuing conversation, whether it's convincingly human. I think it'd be fitting name this test in honor of some forefather of computer science.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EC2's most dangerous feature by ATsch on Sunday October 09, 2016 @05:53AM (#12670521)

I heard robots float on water

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EC2's most dangerous feature by bsandert on Sunday October 09, 2016 @06:14AM (#12670591)

What also floats on water?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EC2's most dangerous feature by tomludus on Sunday October 09, 2016 @06:18AM (#12670607)

Ducks!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EC2's most dangerous feature by OJFord on Sunday October 09, 2016 @10:39AM (#12671379)

Did I mention that dwaxe turned me into a newt?

(I got better.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EC2's most dangerous feature by lucideer on Sunday October 09, 2016 @08:58AM (#12670990)

We could compare the time it took to submit (seconds) to the time it took to comment (3 hours and counting...)

[ Parent | on HN ]