Re:Twitter Confirms It Will Launch Its Own Link Shortener
by qeorge on Wednesday April 14, 2010 @10:42PM
(#1266803)
Key point is that it has to fit in 1 SMS message, that's where the whole 140 character thing comes from.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Twitter Confirms It Will Launch Its Own Link Shortener
by joshu on Wednesday April 14, 2010 @11:29PM
(#1266879)
Tweets already diverge from what will fit in an SMS. For example, 140 chars of unicode won't fit.
Re:Twitter Confirms It Will Launch Its Own Link Shortener
by jmhodges on Thursday April 15, 2010 @04:13AM
(#1267274)
We go by bytes, not chars.
Re:Twitter Confirms It Will Launch Its Own Link Shortener
by chaosmachine on Thursday April 15, 2010 @06:17AM
(#1267455)
That's incorrect, Twitter goes by characters. I actually wrote an app to exploit this loophole:
Re:Twitter Confirms It Will Launch Its Own Link Shortener
by briansmith on Wednesday April 14, 2010 @11:03PM
(#1266845)
It only has to fit in a single SMS message if the tweet is being consumed over SMS. There's no reason to do link shortening in other user interfaces.
Re:Twitter Confirms It Will Launch Its Own Link Shortener
by fredBuddemeyer on Wednesday April 14, 2010 @10:58PM
(#1266828)
yes but is it worth the illegibility and extra step of shortening? how many of those sms recipients make use of the link by retying it in a browser? if there is much of a use case why not have special handling for it?
Re:Twitter Confirms It Will Launch Its Own Link Shortener
by Kilimanjaro on Thursday April 15, 2010 @04:01PM
(#1268791)
I would like to know the percentage of tweets sent as SMS.
Re:Twitter Confirms It Will Launch Its Own Link Shortener
by spazmaster on Thursday April 15, 2010 @02:13AM
(#1267137)
Also SMS fits 160 chars, not 140.
Re:Twitter Confirms It Will Launch Its Own Link Shortener
by barredo on Thursday April 15, 2010 @02:43AM
(#1267171)
20 chars were reserved for twitter username