News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google Noto Fonts. Parent comment

Re:Google Noto Fonts by Normal_gaussian on Thursday October 06, 2016 @06:31PM (#12656681)
That is what would make sense however that is not the case. I should have been clearer and used the term "package" after font:

Local fonts package installed: http://i.imgur.com/ycRs3A0.png

No Local fonts package installed: http://i.imgur.com/TUKsIY4.png

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google Noto Fonts by viraptor on Thursday October 06, 2016 @07:10PM (#12656892)
That's weird. The package seems to include the ttf files only... https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/noto-fonts/
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google Noto Fonts by Normal_gaussian on Thursday October 06, 2016 @07:27PM (#12656974)
It is seemingly to do with how the "web fonts" are implemented by browsers. For more weirdness look here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12656642
[ Parent | on HN ]