An Open Letter From Elizabeth Holmes

Re:An Open Letter From Elizabeth Holmes by lint_roller on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @10:06PM (#12649668)

Yes. That would be a start.

The downvotes are comical. Never seen so much sympathy for people who defraud investors and put healthcare at risk.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An Open Letter From Elizabeth Holmes by dang on Thursday October 06, 2016 @12:26AM (#12650244)

One needn't sympathize with those things to downvote unsubstantive snark on HN.

We detached this comment from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12649468 and marked it off-topic.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An Open Letter From Elizabeth Holmes by lint_roller on Thursday October 06, 2016 @01:03AM (#12650365)

Snark begets snark, dang. I didn't perceive the parent comment to be particularly substantive either.

We'll agree to disagree. Voters seemed to agree with my sentiment after all.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An Open Letter From Elizabeth Holmes by dang on Thursday October 06, 2016 @10:56AM (#12652983)

Voters upvote snark routinely. That's a weakness of the voting system, not a sign of quality. HN can't live by upvotes alone.

[ Parent | on HN ]