News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Are closed social networks inevitable? (2010).

Re:Are closed social networks inevitable? (2010) by forgotpwtomain on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @07:36PM (#12648909)
Potentially this could have been titled: 'Technology, Freedom, Economics and Scarcity'. Rebecca is rarely well articulated, her arguments are innovative, nuanced and delightful to read; to which the closed social network issue seems merely as an aside.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Are closed social networks inevitable? (2010) by jrm415 on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @08:05PM (#12649078)
Perhaps you meant that she is _really_ well articulated (rather than rarely)?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Are closed social networks inevitable? (2010) by forgotpwtomain on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @08:28PM (#12649165)
No, I meant _rarely_ as in it is rare to find a person so well articulated in their argument.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Are closed social networks inevitable? (2010) by bbcbasic on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @08:57PM (#12649283)
I took it as she is articulate only on occasion.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Are closed social networks inevitable? (2010) by swagasaurus-rex on Thursday October 06, 2016 @02:07AM (#12650543)
it was a rarely well articulated appraisal
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Are closed social networks inevitable? (2010) by throwanem on Thursday October 06, 2016 @07:33AM (#12651581)
'Unusually' better captures the meaning you intend. Both words denote roughly the same, but they differ a great deal in their connotations.
[ Parent | on HN ]