Re:The Dizzying Grandeur of 21st Century Agriculture
by xkcd-sucks on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @06:45PM
(#12648615)
because an animal is a self-contained unit which manages disease and feed conversion that scales fairly predictably, while cultured meat has a pretty high entry barrier in terms of feedstock, sanitation etc
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Dizzying Grandeur of 21st Century Agriculture
by bduerst on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @09:02PM
(#12649312)
An animal is also terribly inefficient at converting water and feed into human-consumable nutrients, because it's optimized for survival and reproduction.
The vat based solution is more scalable in the long run, and not impossible (we do it with beer).
Re:The Dizzying Grandeur of 21st Century Agriculture
by teslabox on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @09:23PM
(#12649403)
> An animal is also terribly inefficient at converting water and feed into human-consumable nutrients,
I have an old book somewhere that says the milk cow is the most efficient means of converting a rocky hillside covered with grass into human-usable protein.
Re:The Dizzying Grandeur of 21st Century Agriculture
by bduerst on Thursday October 06, 2016 @12:49PM
(#12653947)
>a rocky hillside covered with grass
Yeah, that's scalable.
Re:The Dizzying Grandeur of 21st Century Agriculture
by walrus01 on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @07:40PM
(#12648934)
the cynic in me says that the "manages diseases" part will become increasingly untenable in the future, as antibiotic-resistant everything proliferate in feedlot environments, and american regulatory agencies fail to put a check on antibiotics mixed into animal feed.
reference: http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/31/magazine/power-steer.html