News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Remote Code Execution Vulnera... by sirtaj on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @12:58AM (#12641640)
> So, then, why do you think that "We need to rewrite everything in Rust" isn't doing something productive?

The Linux kernel didn't get written because people on a forum said "we need to write a complete open source reimplementation of the UNIX kernel," but because Torvalds just went ahead and wrote it. Most things in F/OSS work that way.

Re:Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Remote Code Execution Vulnera... by geofft on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @01:12AM (#12641684)
GNU had a whole manifesto, though. https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.en.html (Although, yes, a signifiant body of software existed when the manifesto was published.)
Re:Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Remote Code Execution Vulnera... by Natsu on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @02:39AM (#12641940)
Linus Benedict Torvalds 8/25/91

Hello everybody out there using minix -

I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing since april, and is starting to get ready.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.os.minix/dlNtH7RR...

Re:Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Remote Code Execution Vulnera... by falcolas on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @09:52AM (#12643770)
I imagine the project is big enough now that anyone who would undertake it would want to be compensated for it. And since that is unlikely to ever pass the cost/benefit ratio for any given corporation, it's unlikely to happen. Not to mention the potential for alienating of the entire existing kernel development group.

It would be much easier to submit patches to slowly upgrade the kernel to a memory safe language, but that would require a lot of political savvy to push through, also making it an unlikely path to be taken. Ultimately, you'd have to convince Linus of the merits, and we all know how much he likes complex languages.