Re:WikiLeaks plans to release documents on US election and G...
by mattlevan on Tuesday October 04, 2016 @01:05PM
(#12637076)
Arguably, we would not have known about the mass trampling of our 4th Amendment rights were it not for Snowden. How could you deny the inherent merit in that?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:WikiLeaks plans to release documents on US election and G...
by jfoster on Tuesday October 04, 2016 @02:13PM
(#12637832)
Well, I know it's an unpopular view, but I think the US government doing that was okay. I don't pretend that's grounded in principle; I don't think that other governments should be able to do it, or that there was no potential for abuse. I think the national security rationale for the programme was valid. (perhaps not in law, I acknowledge)
I agree completely that the leak was very significant, but my preference (I think; not 100%) would be that Snowden hadn't leaked.
Re:WikiLeaks plans to release documents on US election and G...
by ionised on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @11:49AM
(#12644883)
Wait, you're saying you are okay with the US government doing it but not other governments?
How does that work?
Re:WikiLeaks plans to release documents on US election and G...
by teddyh on Sunday October 09, 2016 @05:11PM
(#12673484)
I think it’s called “Patriotism”. See also “American exceptionalism”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_exceptionalism