News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“I just want to run a container” by tadfisher on Sunday October 02, 2016 @04:15PM (#12624012)
nspawn + btrfs is my preferred solution to the "50 containers" problem. The incantation you want is:

    systemd-nspawn --template="/path/to/subvolume" <other args>
This creates a copy-on-write snapshot of the subvolume you supply, which is instantaneous. The --ephemeral flag can be used instead if you want the guest to be able to modify the base filesystem but you do not want those changes to persist across container boots.

Can someone describe what advantages rkt gives you over plain nspawn containers?

Re:“I just want to run a container” by ComputerGuru on Sunday October 02, 2016 @04:53PM (#12624184)
Probably the fact that it doesn't rely on btrfs. (Side note: having been spoiled by zfs on FreeBSD, my btrfs experience can best be summed up as "never again.")
Re:“I just want to run a container” by ChoHag on Monday October 03, 2016 @04:52AM (#12626082)
btrfs is the only file system that's ever lost data on me.